Yeah, truth is the bludgeoner probably couldn't evolve at all. It's method of reproduction doesn't copy itself accurately enough.
Samuel ·
Wouldn't evolution for a tool be the growth in skill of the one who utilizes it? The man that uses the original bludgeoner is at first so unskilled that the produce of the bludgeoner are of inferior quality to the original. But as he gets more skillful, he is able to produce new bludgeoners that are better for creating bludgeoners, or simply better for the style of bludgeon which he has developed. That is the evolution, a skilled enough hand will copy the bludgeoners accurately enough I reckon.
It's 1am, I hope that made sense.
Samuel ·
I suppose I shouldn't say inferior. The first spawn of the bludgeoner could be used in the hands of new bludgeoner-ers. Who would in turn adapt the tool to their hands, creating entirely new genus! I guess it's more like.. The first spawn are not similar enough to be considered the same thing as the original, they'd be like... Mutants.
Comments (3)
The man that uses the original bludgeoner is at first so unskilled that the produce of the bludgeoner are of inferior quality to the original.
But as he gets more skillful, he is able to produce new bludgeoners that are better for creating bludgeoners, or simply better for the style of bludgeon which he has developed.
That is the evolution, a skilled enough hand will copy the bludgeoners accurately enough I reckon.
It's 1am, I hope that made sense.
The first spawn of the bludgeoner could be used in the hands of new bludgeoner-ers. Who would in turn adapt the tool to their hands, creating entirely new genus!
I guess it's more like.. The first spawn are not similar enough to be considered the same thing as the original, they'd be like... Mutants.